Howdy Huffers! Check out our newest photo site Ad Failure!
We’ve also launched some text based sites you may enjoy: Anti Joke, Anti Pickup Line, Pointless Superpowers, and Clarksonisms.
Howdy Huffers! Check out our newest photo site Ad Failure!
We’ve also launched some text based sites you may enjoy: Anti Joke, Anti Pickup Line, Pointless Superpowers, and Clarksonisms.
|
O.o AGGH STOOOP WITH THE FREAKY LANGUAGE!!11eleven!!!1!1
|
|
Whoever think Batman Drawing skills are more important than the question do not know that they would be talking about this in real social gatherings only if many people at Intel did not have these skills.
|
|
Actually, d/dBatSignal(BruceWayne)=Batman. That's the first fundamental theorem of calculus.
Furthermore, Batman =/= Bat Signal. You'll notice, however, that the same logo is on his chest. I'm going to assume that it's something like BatSignal^(1/BatSignal) or something like that. You'd probably have to use L'Hopital's Rule or something anyway.
|
|
using the variable you're differentiating with respect to in the boundaries of the integral, -5, assuming man is not a function of bat, integrating bat*man would give you man*((bat^2)/2) which when evaluated between 'bat' and 0 would give you still man*((bat^2)/2. which gives you one half of a bat squared man, not simply a man. differentiating bat*man with respect to bat however would give you just one man which would equate to bruce wayne.
|
|
I had integral examns days ago... HAHAHAHA
|
|
Very good. So, spiderman.....
|
|
Lol If you differentiate Bruce Wayne you get Batman.
|
|
he actually does need a constant during the use of the fundamental theorem of calculus although in the final answer he could be construed as a correct since the constants cancel we are not using numbers therefore he would need to show the subtraction of the variable constants(ensuring no loss of data due to imaginary numbers)
|
|
lolz. forgot the +c
|
|
he didn't have to use calculus to prove batman is bruce wayne, I'm sure simple algebra would have sufficed.
|
|
Did this on my calc test, actually got a point for it.
|
|
my head hurts!!!! i dont understand any of this!!! im still in 10th grade!!! lol i hate math :)
|
|
Batman is stronger than math, apparently...
|
|
lmao integration. Batman to Bruce Wayne xDDDDDD
|
|
the integration of brucewayne with d(batsymbol) should give batman and not the other way round. so in any case even his cartoon gets no marks
|
|
"question for the people who actually understand that question, is that shit actually usefull to know in your day to day life? i would find batman drawing skills more usefull personally."
I really hope you're still in high school.
As for the question: Very. Mechanical engineer.
|
|
THIS IS AWESOME!
|
|
Actually, the answer is (Batman*Batsymbol)-(Batman*0) = Batman*Batsymbol
|
|
Half of these teachers need to go back to English class. Honestly, apostrophes are NOT that hard to use properly.
|
|
This is correct (Some what...) If you try to integrate a function that doesn't have an integral, you have to use a variable (I forgot what the technique is called.) And this is also correct because the Derivative of Bruce Wayne is Batman, not the other way around. And also the Derivative of Superman would be Clark Kent.
|