Funny Exams

• +142	well he did explain the shape of the graph

• +32	If I was the teacher, he'd get a straight up A for sure! :D

• +13	he sounds like me.. is he also a design student?

• +9	LOL, "...a rather aesthetically pleasing slope."

• +6	I'm glad he at least got one point for that.

• +5	Technically he is totally correct. The question said to explain the shape of the graph and he/she did. Even he was being a smart ass, he answered the question. This student should get full marks for it. It's not a spelling test either so the incorrect spelling of straight does not factor.

• +4	Tat? are you a moron? Rhetorical I already know the answer

• +4	He actually described the shape of the graph, not explain it

• +3	I'd take off a mark for spelling, but after that, he'd get all of them. Besides that, I'd answer: "The undefined mass seems to decrease quickly at an undefined rate and then decelerating, stopping its anti-growth after an undefined amount of time."

• +3	that's a fucking Design & Technology student!!!

• +3	he even spelled "straight" wrong XD

• +1

  Wow... NO ONE GIVES A FUCK!!! GOD! We're here to laugh at idiotic mistakes, not listen to some pretentious assholes, who try correct everything! FUCK! And btw, your answer is stupid... so is your mom... and your dad... You're clearly an idiot as his description is making fun of the vagueness of the graph. If you weren't a back-wooded buck-toothed cousin-fucker you would understand that

• +1	He forgot to precise the length of each line.

• Um, this is something I wrote in middle school. I think I had a biology paper posted too. =]

• actually what he did was describing the graph and not explaining. so he's still wrong. haha

• -1

  wowww

• -3	LOL.... tat was awesome.... respect tat student...

• -3

  “Besides that, I’d answer: “The undefined mass seems to decrease quickly at an undefined rate and then decelerating, stopping its anti-growth after an undefined amount of time.” Wow... NO ONE GIVES A FUCK!!! GOD! We're here to laugh at idiotic mistakes, not listen to some pretentious assholes, who try correct everything! FUCK! And btw, your answer is stupid... so is your mom... and your dad...” XDDD awesome comeback FTW!! ((reCAPTCHA: Pompeii recounts. LOL!))

• -3

  "The undefined mass (ERROR:irrelevant) seems (ERROR:no, not seems. it does) to decrease quickly (ERROR: It is decreasing in a non-linear fashion, appearing to be possibly an inverse proportionality) at an undefined rate (ERROR:no, the rate is defined implicitly, as before. That is the point) and then decelerating (ERROR:irrelevant, decelleration is implicit in the rate specification above), stopping its anti-growth (ERROR: no such terminology as "anti growth") after an undefined amount of time." Wow. Zero marks for the smartass. Now somebody correct me and things will really be rolling in here.

• -8

  Besides that, I’d answer: “The undefined mass seems to decrease quickly at an undefined rate and then decelerating, stopping its anti-growth after an undefined amount of time.” Wow... NO ONE GIVES A FUCK!!! GOD! We're here to laugh at idiotic mistakes, not listen to some pretentious assholes, who try correct everything! FUCK! And btw, your answer is stupid... so is your mom... and your dad...

1626 - well he did explain the shape of the graph | Funny Exams

1626 - well he did explain the shape of the graph | Funny Exams

1626 - well he did explain the shape of the graph | Funny Exams

1626 - well he did explain the shape of the graph | Funny Exams

1626 - well he did explain the shape of the graph | Funny Exams

1626 - well he did explain the shape of the graph | Funny Exams

1626 - well he did explain the shape of the graph | Funny Exams

1626 - well he did explain the shape of the graph | Funny Exams

1626 - well he did explain the shape of the graph | Funny Exams

1626 - well he did explain the shape of the graph | Funny Exams

1626 - well he did explain the shape of the graph | Funny Exams

1626 - well he did explain the shape of the graph | Funny Exams