Howdy Huffers! Check out our newest photo site Ad Failure!
We’ve also launched some text based sites you may enjoy: Anti Joke, Anti Pickup Line, Pointless Superpowers, and Clarksonisms.
Howdy Huffers! Check out our newest photo site Ad Failure!
We’ve also launched some text based sites you may enjoy: Anti Joke, Anti Pickup Line, Pointless Superpowers, and Clarksonisms.
|
It IS fake. Not because the teacher misspelled "appropriate" but because of the fact that I've seen it on many other sites with different teacher remarks.
|
|
I give it a "C+" for a Cupchicks essay.
|
|
I'm afraid I will be turned off sex If I see this video...just from the students paper it appears to be an anti-fluid video
|
|
ah, here is the rest of it.
|
|
im sure that he/she look for the given link
|
|
Hilarious! Haha, but I gotta say, this society has really collapsed in terms of acting in an orderly manner.
"...the teacher is being very immature about this paper"
The real question is, whether such "films" should be tolerated in academic contexts. Sure, he was able to "analyze" a film. Would you use the same argument in a case involving two 12 year old children who "consent" to being filmed having sexual intimacy? No, you'd say "that's immoral and against to law" - which is a VERY subjective response. If 300 years in the future, it WASN'T immoral and against the law, what then? You submit and accept it?
My point is, there has to be a place where one draws the line. If people must, they can "interpret" and "analyze" such disgusting films on their on time and discuss with others interested. A teacher shouldn't be forced to deal with matters that can very easily be against her belief system or code of ethics (and not just by a bit, but by a lot). Where's "respect" now?
Goodness, ridiculous waste of talent.
|
|
ha lol u can see the other side of the paper which is at http://funnyexam.com/answers/1599-i-must-say-this-is-not-a-h.
|
|
Bat ****? Did I just read that right?
|
|
this guy and Hitler must think alike.
|
|
You know...this might not be appropriate, but if you actually use your noggin a bit, this is quite a high-quality report...the teacher's just an ass.
|
|
She wrote "see me" to keep her job, but aroused by the paper, she went home and watched the video!
|
|
The only problem is the paper kinda sucks. There are no references to support the commonality of the themes the author is talking about, no explanation of the symbols s'he's interpreting. S/he's unclear about the relation of the 'inversion of the phallus' and the vagina symbol in the first page. I don't think I woulda passed this paper just based on the writing, regardless of the subject. It is pretty cool the author tried to apply scholarly discourse to that 2girls1cup tho.
|
|
More proof that there is meaning in even the simplest of things.
|
|
Tl;dr
|
|
who ever did this is a god
|
|
I really dont think the teacher was that harsh... The comments are cool. Hell, I would be more pissed. Notice the "You seem to have a creative flail for writing".
|
|
**** is not suitable in my class. I'll kick your ass.
|
|
tl;dr
|
|
tl;dr
|
|
this is a legit paper and this guy obviously took it very seriously. definatly not a 0
|